You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validity and relative validity of a novel digital approach for 24-h dietary recall in athletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-13-41 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsay B Baker, Lisa E Heaton, Kimberly W Stein, Ryan P Nuccio, Asker E Jeukendrup |
| Abstract |
We developed a digital dietary analysis tool for athletes (DATA) using a modified 24-h recall method and an integrated, customized nutrient database. The purpose of this study was to assess DATA's validity and relative validity by measuring its agreement with registered dietitians' (RDs) direct observations (OBSERVATION) and 24-h dietary recall interviews using the USDA 5-step multiple-pass method (INTERVIEW), respectively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 24% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 41% |
| Scientists | 18 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,156,037
of 24,975,223 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#331
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,183
of 232,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#13
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,975,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.