↓ Skip to main content

Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005497.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chelsea B. Polis, David A Grimes, Kate Schaffer, Kelly Blanchard, Anna Glasier, Cynthia Harper

Abstract

Emergency contraception can prevent pregnancy when taken after unprotected intercourse. Obtaining emergency contraception within the recommended time frame is difficult for many women. Advance provision, in which women receive a supply of emergency contraception before unprotected sex, could circumvent some obstacles to timely use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 37%
Social Sciences 16 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 19 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,212,138
of 16,286,141 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,230
of 11,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,412
of 75,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,286,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.