↓ Skip to main content

Impact of a chronic disease self-management program on health care utilization in rural communities: a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of a chronic disease self-management program on health care utilization in rural communities: a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan B Jaglal, Sara JT Guilcher, Gillian Hawker, Wendy Lou, Nancy M Salbach, Michael Manno, Merrick Zwarenstein

Abstract

Internationally, chronic disease self-management programs (CDSMPs) have been widely promoted with the assumption that confident, knowledgeable patients practicing self-management behavior will experience improved health and utilize fewer healthcare resources. However, there is a paucity of published data supporting this claim and the majority of the evidence is based on self-report.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Other 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Psychology 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,300,431
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,546
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,297
of 227,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#81
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.