↓ Skip to main content

Formula milk versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formula milk versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002972.pub2
Authors

Ginny Henderson, Mary Y Anthony, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Italy 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Other 9 8%
Other 27 24%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 19 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,211,800
of 14,412,062 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,489
of 10,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,226
of 190,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,412,062 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.