↓ Skip to main content

Formula milk versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Formula milk versus maternal breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002972.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ginny Henderson, Mary Y Anthony, William McGuire

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 12 9%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,667,221
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,269
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,324
of 88,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.