↓ Skip to main content

Anesthetic challenges of patients with cardiac comorbidities undergoing major urologic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in International Archives of Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 103)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anesthetic challenges of patients with cardiac comorbidities undergoing major urologic surgery
Published in
International Archives of Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1755-7682-7-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rudin Domi, Hektor Sula, Ilir Ohri, Arben Beqiri, Myzafer Kaci, Artan Bodeci, Haki Laho

Abstract

The cardiac patient undergoing major urologic surgery is a complex case requiring a great attention by the anesthesiologist. Number of this group of patients having to go through this procedure is constantly increasing, due to prolonged life, increased agressiveness of surgery and increased anesthesia's safety. The anesthesiologist usually has to deal with several problems of the patient, such as hypertension, chronic heart failure, coronary artery disease, rhythm disturbances, intraoperative hemodymanic changes, intraoperative bleeding, perioperative fluid imbalance, and metabolic disturbances. A cardiac patient undergoing major urologic surgery is a complex case requiring a great attention by the anesthesiologist. The scope of this review article is to present the most frequent issues encountered with this group of patients, and to synthetically discuss the respective strategies and maneuvers during perioperative period, which is the major challenge for the anesthesiologist.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Unknown 11 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,263,731
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Medicine
#32
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,127
of 242,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Medicine
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.