↓ Skip to main content

An overview of Ghana’s mental health system: results from an assessment using the World Health Organization’s Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS)

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An overview of Ghana’s mental health system: results from an assessment using the World Health Organization’s Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO-AIMS)
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-8-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Roberts, Caroline Mogan, Joseph B Asare

Abstract

This survey provides data on the Mental Health System in Ghana for the year 2011. It supplies essential planning information for the implementation of Ghana's new Mental Health Act 846 of 2012, a renewal of the Ghana 5 year plan for mental health and it contributes to international knowledge base on mental health. It provides a baseline from which to measure future progress in Ghana and comparison data for use in other countries. In addition to reporting our findings we describe and analyse deficiencies and strengths of the Ghana mental health system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 405 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 20%
Student > Bachelor 46 11%
Student > Postgraduate 38 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Researcher 32 8%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 123 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 77 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 14%
Social Sciences 49 12%
Psychology 37 9%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 49 12%
Unknown 129 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,467,479
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#54
of 748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,367
of 233,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.