↓ Skip to main content

Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy and Patient Outcomes in the Randomized Evaluation of Normal Versus Augmented Level of Replacement Therapy Study*

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Timing of Renal Replacement Therapy and Patient Outcomes in the Randomized Evaluation of Normal Versus Augmented Level of Replacement Therapy Study*
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000343
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun M, Bellomo R, Cass A, Gallagher M, Lo S, Lee J, Min Jun, Rinaldo Bellomo, Alan Cass, Martin Gallagher, Serigne Lo, Joanne Lee

Abstract

To explore the relationship between timing of continuous renal replacement therapy commencement and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 28 and 90 days.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
Japan 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
France 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 63 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 20%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 28 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 77%
Unspecified 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,094,432
of 11,798,365 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#1,028
of 6,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,304
of 189,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#30
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,798,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.