↓ Skip to main content

A model reduction method for biochemical reaction networks

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A model reduction method for biochemical reaction networks
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-8-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shodhan Rao, Arjan van der Schaft, Karen van Eunen, Barbara M Bakker, Bayu Jayawardhana

Abstract

In this paper we propose a model reduction method for biochemical reaction networks governed by a variety of reversible and irreversible enzyme kinetic rate laws, including reversible Michaelis-Menten and Hill kinetics. The method proceeds by a stepwise reduction in the number of complexes, defined as the left and right-hand sides of the reactions in the network. It is based on the Kron reduction of the weighted Laplacian matrix, which describes the graph structure of the complexes and reactions in the network. It does not rely on prior knowledge of the dynamic behaviour of the network and hence can be automated, as we demonstrate. The reduced network has fewer complexes, reactions, variables and parameters as compared to the original network, and yet the behaviour of a preselected set of significant metabolites in the reduced network resembles that of the original network. Moreover the reduced network largely retains the structure and kinetics of the original model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 79 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 32%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Mathematics 8 9%
Computer Science 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,661,523
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#314
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,174
of 228,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.