↓ Skip to main content

Financial impact of adopting implantable loop recorder diagnostic for unexplained syncope compared with conventional diagnostic pathway in Portugal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Financial impact of adopting implantable loop recorder diagnostic for unexplained syncope compared with conventional diagnostic pathway in Portugal
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-14-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Providência, Rui Candeias, Carlos Morais, Hipólito Reis, Luís Elvas, Vitor Sanfins, Sara Farinha, Simon Eggington, Stelios Tsintzos

Abstract

To estimate the short- and long-term financial impact of early referral for implantable loop recorder diagnostic (ILR) versus conventional diagnostic pathway (CDP) in the management of unexplained syncope (US) in the Portuguese National Health Service (PNHS).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Other 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 48%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 11%
Engineering 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1,102
of 1,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,230
of 227,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.