↓ Skip to main content

ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF THE PATHOLOGICAL NASAL EPITHELIUM INDUCED BY IRRADIATION

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, January 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF THE PATHOLOGICAL NASAL EPITHELIUM INDUCED BY IRRADIATION
Published in
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho, January 1985
DOI 10.3950/jibiinkoka.88.1562
Authors

HIROSHI IKEOKA, YOSHIHIRO OHASHI, KENICHI MARUOKA, HIROYUKI KOSHIMO, YOSHIAKI NAKAI, YASUTO ONOYAMA

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2014.
All research outputs
#1,790,710
of 4,505,550 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#14
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,380
of 107,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai kaiho
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,550 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 58th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them