↓ Skip to main content

Deep sea tests of a prototype of the KM3NeT digital optical module

Overview of attention for article published in European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep sea tests of a prototype of the KM3NeT digital optical module
Published in
European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields, September 2014
DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3056-3
Authors

S. Adrián-Martínez, M. Ageron, F. Aharonian, S. Aiello, A. Albert, F. Ameli, E. G. Anassontzis, M. Anghinolfi, G. Anton, S. Anvar, M. Ardid, R. de Asmundis, K. Balasi, H. Band, G. Barbarino, E. Barbarito, F. Barbato, B. Baret, S. Baron, A. Belias, E. Berbee, A. M. van den Berg, A. Berkien, V. Bertin, S. Beurthey, V. van Beveren, N. Beverini, S. Biagi, S. Bianucci, M. Billault, A. Birbas, H. Boer Rookhuizen, R. Bormuth, V. Bouché, B. Bouhadef, G. Bourlis, M. Bouwhuis, C. Bozza, R. Bruijn, J. Brunner, G. Cacopardo, L. Caillat, M. Calamai, D. Calvo, A. Capone, L. Caramete, F. Caruso, S. Cecchini, A. Ceres, R. Cereseto, C. Champion, F. Château, T. Chiarusi, B. Christopoulou, M. Circella, L. Classen, R. Cocimano, S. Colonges, R. Coniglione, A. Cosquer, M. Costa, P. Coyle, A. Creusot, C. Curtil, G. Cuttone, C. D’Amato, A. D’Amico, G. De Bonis, G. De Rosa, N. Deniskina, J.-J. Destelle, C. Distefano, C. Donzaud, D. Dornic, Q. Dorosti-Hasankiadeh, E. Drakopoulou, D. Drouhin, L. Drury, D. Durand, T. Eberl, C. Eleftheriadis, D. Elsaesser, A. Enzenhöfer, P. Fermani, L. A. Fusco, D. Gajana, T. Gal, S. Galatà, F. Gallo, F. Garufi, M. Gebyehu, V. Giordano, N. Gizani, R. Gracia Ruiz, K. Graf, R. Grasso, G. Grella, A. Grmek, R. Habel, H. van Haren, T. Heid, A. Heijboer, E. Heine, S. Henry, J. J. Hernández-Rey, B. Herold, M. A. Hevinga, M. van der Hoek, J. Hofestädt, J. Hogenbirk, C. Hugon, J. Hößl, M. Imbesi, C. James, P. Jansweijer, J. Jochum, M. de Jong, M. Kadler, O. Kalekin, A. Kappes, E. Kappos, U. Katz, O. Kavatsyuk, P. Keller, G. Kieft, E. Koffeman, H. Kok, P. Kooijman, J. Koopstra, A. Korporaal, A. Kouchner, S. Koutsoukos, I. Kreykenbohm, V. Kulikovskiy, R. Lahmann, P. Lamare, G. Larosa, D. Lattuada, H. Le Provost, A. Leisos, D. Lenis, E. Leonora, M. Lindsey Clark, A. Liolios, C. D. Llorens Alvarez, H. Löhner, D. Lo Presti, F. Louis, E. Maccioni, K. Mannheim, K. Manolopoulos, A. Margiotta, O. Mariş, C. Markou, J. A. Martínez-Mora, A. Martini, R. Masullo, T. Michael, P. Migliozzi, E. Migneco, A. Miraglia, C. Mollo, M. Mongelli, M. Morganti, S. Mos, Y. Moudden, P. Musico, M. Musumeci, C. Nicolaou, C. A. Nicolau, A. Orlando, A. Orzelli, K. Papageorgiou, A. Papaikonomou, R. Papaleo, G. E. Păvălaş, H. Peek, C. Pellegrino, M. G. Pellegriti, C. Perrina, C. Petridou, P. Piattelli, K. Pikounis, V. Popa, Th. Pradier, M. Priede, G. Pühlhofer, S. Pulvirenti, C. Racca, F. Raffaelli, N. Randazzo, P. A. Rapidis, P. Razis, D. Real, L. Resvanis, J. Reubelt, G. Riccobene, A. Rovelli, J. Royon, M. Saldaña, D. F. E. Samtleben, M. Sanguineti, A. Santangelo, P. Sapienza, I. Savvidis, J. Schmelling, J. Schnabel, M. Sedita, T. Seitz, I. Sgura, F. Simeone, I. Siotis, V. Sipala, M. Solazzo, A. Spitaleri, M. Spurio, G. Stavropoulos, J. Steijger, T. Stolarczyk, D. Stransky, M. Taiuti, G. Terreni, D. Tézier, S. Théraube, L. F. Thompson, P. Timmer, H. I. Trapierakis, L. Trasatti, A. Trovato, M. Tselengidou, A. Tsirigotis, S. Tzamarias, E. Tzamariudaki, B. Vallage, V. Van Elewyck, J. Vermeulen, P. Vernin, S. Viola, D. Vivolo, P. Werneke, L. Wiggers, J. Wilms, E. de Wolf, R. H. L. van Wooning, K. Yatkin, K. Zachariadou, E. Zonca, J. D. Zornoza, J. Zúñiga, A. Zwart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 42%
Unspecified 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 20 65%
Unspecified 5 16%
Engineering 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,650,420
of 4,553,834 outputs
Outputs from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#32,362
of 286,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,746
of 108,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Physical Journal C -- Particles & Fields
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,553,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286,057 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.