↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for improving modifiable risk factor control in the secondary prevention of stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009103.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate E Lager, Amit K Mistri, Kamlesh Khunti, Victoria J Haunton, Aung K Sett, Andrew D Wilson

Abstract

People with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) are at increased risk of future stroke and other cardiovascular events. Evidence-based strategies for secondary stroke prevention have been established. However, the implementation of prevention strategies could be improved.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 20%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 38 23%
Unknown 13 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 20%
Psychology 10 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 24 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,442,449
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,952
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,560
of 189,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.