↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
43 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Riley, Anne‐Marie Glenny, Fang Hua, Helen V Worthington

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 428 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 17%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 9%
Researcher 34 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 5%
Other 75 18%
Unknown 148 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 139 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 11%
Psychology 12 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 43 10%
Unknown 168 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#928,094
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,828
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,867
of 327,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.