You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Selection plays the hand it was dealt: evidence that human adaptation commonly targets standing genetic variation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-017-1280-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rajiv C. McCoy, Joshua M. Akey |
Abstract |
Using a powerful machine learning approach, a recent study of human genomes has revealed widespread footprints of recent positive selection on standing genetic variation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 29% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Russia | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
Scientists | 9 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 25% |
Researcher | 10 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Professor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 51% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,318,336
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,383
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,904
of 327,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#46
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.