You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Xanthines as Adenosine Receptor Antagonists
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 6 |
| Book title |
Methylxanthines
|
| Published in |
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-13443-2_6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-213442-5, 978-3-64-213443-2
|
| Authors |
Müller CE, Jacobson KA, Christa E. Müller, Kenneth A. Jacobson, Christa Müller, Müller, Christa E., Jacobson, Kenneth A. |
| Abstract |
The natural plant alkaloids caffeine and theophylline were the first adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists described in the literature. They exhibit micromolar affinities and are non-selective. A large number of derivatives and analogues were subsequently synthesized and evaluated as AR antagonists. Very potent antagonists have thus been developed with selectivity for each of the four AR subtypes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 28 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,497,520
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#223
of 689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,755
of 107,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.