↓ Skip to main content

Should Clinicians Medicate against Structural Violence? Potential Iatrogenic Risks and the Need for Social Interventions

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should Clinicians Medicate against Structural Violence? Potential Iatrogenic Risks and the Need for Social Interventions
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2017
DOI 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.8.ecas2-1708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren E Hock, Niranjan S Karnik

Abstract

This paper examines how a child psychiatrist might approach treatment of aggression in foster care youth. We argue that a multimodal approach is best. Physicians should weigh not only the iatrogenic risks of off-label antipsychotic medications but also the possible consequences of failing to treat complicating social factors at hand. Advocates must address structural violence and failures of imagination in their efforts to improve mental health equity among vulnerable youth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Psychology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 26%