↓ Skip to main content

As rupturas sociais e o cotidiano de pessoas em situação de rua: estudo etnográfico

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
As rupturas sociais e o cotidiano de pessoas em situação de rua: estudo etnográfico
Published in
Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, July 2017
DOI 10.1590/1983-1447.2016.esp.72861
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Célia Fiorati, Regina Yoneko Dakuzaku Carretta, Leonardo Martins Kebbe, Beatriz Lobato Cardoso, Joab Jefferson da Silva Xavier

Abstract

To discover the generators of disruptions in social support networks and identify the everyday life and projects of life of homeless people. Ethnographic study conducted between 2012 and 2013 in Ribeirão Preto -SP, Brazil. The participants were fifteen homeless people. Data were collected through video-recorded interviews addressing histories of life and a field diary. Data analysis was based on Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action. Results revealed that the participants' families have faced inequalities for many generations and that everyday life is marked by violence and death, poverty and exclusion, disrupted social networks, loneliness, alcohol and drug consumption, and other socially determined diseases. The situation of living on the streets stems from several factors present in the organization of the Brazilian society and social determinants condition the life and health of homeless people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 13 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 13%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,476,767
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#57
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,062
of 324,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.