↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of a Weak Acid Electrolgtic Water Against Various Kinds of Pathogenie Microorganisms

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 100)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of a Weak Acid Electrolgtic Water Against Various Kinds of Pathogenie Microorganisms
Published in
Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control, November 1999
DOI 10.11550/jsei1986.14.255
Authors

Takako Tachikawa, Eiji Watari, Kenji Someya, Toshizumi Ikeda, Minako Araake, Wakae Fujimaki, Takao Kanai, Takehiko Uchiyama, Yoshitaka Miyanaga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control
#34
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,681
of 36,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.