↓ Skip to main content

The use of PCA3 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Urology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of PCA3 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
Published in
Nature Reviews Urology, May 2009
DOI 10.1038/nrurol.2009.40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daphne Hessels, Jack A. Schalken

Abstract

Although the routine use of serum PSA testing has undoubtedly increased prostate cancer detection, one of its main drawbacks has been its lack of specificity, which results in a high negative biopsy rate. Consequently, a large population of men with chronically elevated serum PSA and one or more negative biopsies has emerged. More accurate tests are needed that can help identify which patients are at high risk of developing prostate cancer, and for whom repeat prostate biopsies are mandatory. To improve the specificity of prostate cancer diagnosis, prostate-cancer-specific markers, such as prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3), are needed. The strong association between PCA3 mRNA overexpression and malignant transformation of prostate epithelium indicates its potential as a diagnostic biomarker. Quantification of PCA3 mRNA levels in urine was found to help predict the outcome of prostate biopsies. The intensive and time-consuming reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction PCA3 urine test has been translated successfully into the fast and easy transcription-mediated amplification (TMA)-based PCA3 test. This test is the first RNA-based molecular diagnostic assay in body fluids for prostate cancer that is available to urologists. This Review describes the translation of the molecular marker PCA3 from the research laboratory to clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 141 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 18%
Chemistry 7 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,970,761
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Urology
#553
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,047
of 94,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Urology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them