↓ Skip to main content

Herniorrafia inguinal convencional com tela autofixante versus videolaparoscópica totalmente extraperitoneal com tela de polipropileno: resultados no pós-operatório precoce

Overview of attention for article published in Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Herniorrafia inguinal convencional com tela autofixante versus videolaparoscópica totalmente extraperitoneal com tela de polipropileno: resultados no pós-operatório precoce
Published in
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/0100-69912017003003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cunha-e-Silva, José Antonio, Oliveira, Flávio Malcher Martins de, Ayres, Antonio Felipe Santa Maria Coquillard, Iglesias, Antonio Carlos Ribeiro Garrido

Abstract

to evaluate the early postoperative results of inguinal hernia repair by the conventional technique with self-fixating mesh versus laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair with polypropylene mesh. We compared pain, surgical time and early complications. this is a prospective, case-series study of 80 consecutive patients treated in the surgical clinic of the Gaffrée e Guinle University Hospital (HUGG). We included patients with unilateral inguinal hernia, not relapsed and operated only on an elective basis. We divided patients into two groups of 40 patients each, SF group (conventional technique using self-fixating mesh) and LP group (laparoscopic technique with polypropylene mesh). We followed patients up until the 45th postoperative day. of the 80 patients, 98.7% were male and the majority had indirect right inguinal hernias (Nyhus II). There was no difference between the groups studied in respect to pain and operative time. However, more complications occurred (seroma and hematoma) in the open surgery group. both operations have proved feasible, safe and with minimal postoperative pain and a low operating time.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 12 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#10,258,478
of 11,563,317 outputs
Outputs from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#57
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,222
of 265,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,563,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them