You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Gene Therapy in Tyrosinemia: Potential and Pitfalls
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 21 |
| Book title |
Hereditary Tyrosinemia
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-55780-9_21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-955779-3, 978-3-31-955780-9
|
| Authors |
Sophie Carter, Yannick Doyon |
| Abstract |
In this chapter, we intend to review gene therapy concepts applied to the potential treatment of tyrosinemia for parents and pediatricians. Therefore, our main objective is to give general informations in a comprehensible manner. Considering the nature of tyrosinemia and the current state of technology, a particular focus will be put on strategies using viral delivery of DNA to the liver. In light of the recent development of the CRISPR technology and the revival of promises for previously unavailable therapeutical tools, the present chapter aims at presenting up to date facts and potential pitfalls towards an application for metabolic diseases, in particular tyrosinemia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 39% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,359,314
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,104
of 4,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,319
of 421,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#192
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.