↓ Skip to main content

Validation of the Chinese version of the Reynolds’ suicidal ideation questionnaire: psychometric properties and its short version

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validation of the Chinese version of the Reynolds’ suicidal ideation questionnaire: psychometric properties and its short version
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-12-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Zhang, Paul Siu Fai Yip, King-wa Fu

Abstract

This study aims to validate the Chinese version of the Reynolds' Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ) in a Chinese society and explore a convenient short version.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,449
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,345
of 235,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.