You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial of IV Iron Supplementation for Anemia of Traumatic Critical Illness*
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000408 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fredric M. Pieracci, Robert T. Stovall, Brant Jaouen, Maria Rodil, Anthony Cappa, Clay Cothren Burlew, Daniel N. Holena, Ronald Maier, Stepheny Berry, Jerry Jurkovich, Ernest E. Moore |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the efficacy of IV iron supplementation of anemic, critically ill trauma patients. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Canada | 3 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 22% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,630,737
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#1,204
of 8,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,234
of 237,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#18
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.