↓ Skip to main content

Ethics of conducting research in conflict settings

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethics of conducting research in conflict settings
Published in
Conflict and Health, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1752-1505-3-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan Ford, Edward J Mills, Rony Zachariah, Ross Upshur

Abstract

Humanitarian agencies are increasingly engaged in research in conflict and post-conflict settings. This is justified by the need to improve the quality of assistance provided in these settings and to collect evidence of the highest standard to inform advocacy and policy change. The instability of conflict-affected areas, and the heightened vulnerability of populations caught in conflict, calls for careful consideration of the research methods employed, the levels of evidence sought, and ethical requirements. Special attention needs to be placed on the feasibility and necessity of doing research in conflict-settings, and the harm-benefit ratio for potential research participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 212 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 38 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 64 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 21%
Arts and Humanities 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 52 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,259,890
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#309
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,006
of 115,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.