↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients
Published in
Nature Medicine, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/nm0817-1004c
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmet Zehir, Ryma Benayed, Ronak H Shah, Aijazuddin Syed, Sumit Middha, Hyunjae R Kim, Preethi Srinivasan, Jianjiong Gao, Debyani Chakravarty, Sean M Devlin, Matthew D Hellmann, David A Barron, Alison M Schram, Meera Hameed, Snjezana Dogan, Dara S Ross, Jaclyn F Hechtman, Deborah F DeLair, JinJuan Yao, Diana L Mandelker, Donavan T Cheng, Raghu Chandramohan, Abhinita S Mohanty, Ryan N Ptashkin, Gowtham Jayakumaran, Meera Prasad, Mustafa H Syed, Anoop Balakrishnan Rema, Zhen Y Liu, Khedoudja Nafa, Laetitia Borsu, Justyna Sadowska, Jacklyn Casanova, Ruben Bacares, Iwona J Kiecka, Anna Razumova, Julie B Son, Lisa Stewart, Tessara Baldi, Kerry A Mullaney, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie, Efsevia Vakiani, Adam A Abeshouse, Alexander V Penson, Philip Jonsson, Niedzica Camacho, Matthew T Chang, Helen H Won, Benjamin E Gross, Ritika Kundra, Zachary J Heins, Hsiao-Wei Chen, Sarah Phillips, Hongxin Zhang, Jiaojiao Wang, Angelica Ochoa, Jonathan Wills, Michael Eubank, Stacy B Thomas, Stuart M Gardos, Dalicia N Reales, Jesse Galle, Robert Durany, Roy Cambria, Wassim Abida, Andrea Cercek, Darren R Feldman, Mrinal M Gounder, A Ari Hakimi, James J Harding, Gopa Iyer, Yelena Y Janjigian, Emmet J Jordan, Ciara M Kelly, Maeve A Lowery, Luc G T Morris, Antonio M Omuro, Nitya Raj, Pedram Razavi, Alexander N Shoushtari, Neerav Shukla, Tara E Soumerai, Anna M Varghese, Rona Yaeger, Jonathan Coleman, Bernard Bochner, Gregory J Riely, Leonard B Saltz, Howard I Scher, Paul J Sabbatini, Mark E Robson, David S Klimstra, Barry S Taylor, Jose Baselga, Nikolaus Schultz, David M Hyman, Maria E Arcila, David B Solit, Marc Ladanyi, Michael F Berger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,893,044
of 11,564,189 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#5,927
of 6,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,527
of 265,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#55
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,564,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.