Title |
An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Lymph Node Number and Staging in pT3 Colon Cancer Using Population-Based Data
|
---|---|
Published in |
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/dcr.0b013e3181c70425 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nancy N. Baxter, Rocco Ricciardi, Marko Simunovic, David R. Urbach, Beth A. Virnig |
Abstract |
The number of lymph nodes examined has been proposed as a quality benchmark for colon cancer surgery, although it is unknown whether this strategy reduces understaging. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 15% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Other | 10 | 30% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 64% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2010.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#3,739
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,836
of 172,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.