↓ Skip to main content

Affect in response to stressors and coping strategies: an ecological momentary assessment study of borderline personality disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Affect in response to stressors and coping strategies: an ecological momentary assessment study of borderline personality disorder
Published in
Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40479-017-0059-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sadia R. Chaudhury, Hanga Galfalvy, Emily Biggs, Tse-Hwei Choo, J. John Mann, Barbara Stanley

Abstract

Affect instability is a core symptom of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Ecological momentary assessment allows for an understanding of real-time changes in affect in response to various daily stressors. The purpose of this study was to explore changes in affect in response to specific stressors and coping strategies in subjects with BPD utilizing ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodology. Subjects (n = 50) with BPD were asked to complete real-time assessments about stressors experienced, affect felt, and coping strategies employed six times per day for a 1-week period. Mixed effect regression models were used to measure the effect of stressors and coping strategies on affect change. While most stressors led to experiencing more negative affect, only being in a disagreement was independently associated with increased negative affect. Among coping strategies, only doing something good for oneself independently reduced negative affect, controlling for all other coping strategies used. These findings provide valuable insights into affective instability in BPD and can help inform treatment with individuals with the disorder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 19 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,631,430
of 24,801,176 outputs
Outputs from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#95
of 213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,009
of 318,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,801,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.