↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of a family history screening questionnaire in Australian primary care.

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Family Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of a family history screening questionnaire in Australian primary care.
Published in
Annals of Family Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1370/afm.1617
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon D. Emery, Gabrielle Reid, A. Toby Prevost, David Ravine, Fiona M. Walter, Emery JD, Reid G, Prevost AT, Ravine D, Walter FM, J. D. Emery, G. Reid, A. T. Prevost, D. Ravine, F. M. Walter

Abstract

We aimed to validate a family history screening questionnaire in an Australian primary care population designed to identify people at increased risk for breast, ovarian, colorectal, and prostate cancer; melanoma; ischemic heart disease; and type 2 diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 20 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Unspecified 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Other 8 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,491,626
of 11,717,557 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#553
of 1,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,310
of 188,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,717,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.