↓ Skip to main content

Training of patient and consumer representatives in the basic competencies of evidence-based medicine: a feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training of patient and consumer representatives in the basic competencies of evidence-based medicine: a feasibility study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-10-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina Berger, Anke Steckelberg, Gabriele Meyer, Jürgen Kasper, Ingrid Mühlhauser

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become standard approach in medicine. Patients and health authorities increasingly claim active patient roles in decision making. Education to cope with these roles might be useful. We investigated the feasibility, acceptability and possible impact of EBM training courses for patient and consumer representatives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 79 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Other 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 33%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Psychology 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,134,869
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,942
of 3,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,679
of 165,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.