↓ Skip to main content

Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Human Behaviour, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 775)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
13 blogs
twitter
511 tweeters
facebook
39 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Global evidence of extreme intuitive moral prejudice against atheists
Published in
Nature Human Behaviour, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41562-017-0151
Authors

Will M. Gervais, Dimitris Xygalatas, Ryan T. McKay, Michiel van Elk, Emma E. Buchtel, Mark Aveyard, Sarah R. Schiavone, Ilan Dar-Nimrod, Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, Tapani Riekki, Eva Kundtová Klocová, Jonathan E. Ramsay, Joseph Bulbulia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 511 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Professor 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 30%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Philosophy 4 4%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 18 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 889. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#5,873
of 14,361,293 outputs
Outputs from Nature Human Behaviour
#20
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270
of 269,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Human Behaviour
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,361,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.