↓ Skip to main content

Hypocapnia and the injured brain: More harm than benefit

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypocapnia and the injured brain: More harm than benefit
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, May 2010
DOI 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181d8cf2b
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Curley, Brian P. Kavanagh, John G. Laffey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 264 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 47 17%
Student > Postgraduate 36 13%
Student > Master 35 13%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 63 23%
Unknown 50 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 174 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Psychology 4 1%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 57 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#6,915
of 9,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,970
of 108,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#27
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.