↓ Skip to main content

Amygdala interneuron subtypes control fear learning through disinhibition

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
40 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
421 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1080 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amygdala interneuron subtypes control fear learning through disinhibition
Published in
Nature, May 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen B. E. Wolff, Jan Gründemann, Philip Tovote, Sabine Krabbe, Gilad A. Jacobson, Christian Müller, Cyril Herry, Ingrid Ehrlich, Rainer W. Friedrich, Johannes J. Letzkus, Andreas Lüthi

Abstract

Learning is mediated by experience-dependent plasticity in neuronal circuits. Activity in neuronal circuits is tightly regulated by different subtypes of inhibitory interneurons, yet their role in learning is poorly understood. Using a combination of in vivo single-unit recordings and optogenetic manipulations, we show that in the mouse basolateral amygdala, interneurons expressing parvalbumin (PV) and somatostatin (SOM) bidirectionally control the acquisition of fear conditioning--a simple form of associative learning--through two distinct disinhibitory mechanisms. During an auditory cue, PV(+) interneurons are excited and indirectly disinhibit the dendrites of basolateral amygdala principal neurons via SOM(+) interneurons, thereby enhancing auditory responses and promoting cue-shock associations. During an aversive footshock, however, both PV(+) and SOM(+) interneurons are inhibited, which boosts postsynaptic footshock responses and gates learning. These results demonstrate that associative learning is dynamically regulated by the stimulus-specific activation of distinct disinhibitory microcircuits through precise interactions between different subtypes of local interneurons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,080 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 24 2%
Germany 6 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 1019 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 283 26%
Researcher 233 22%
Student > Master 108 10%
Student > Bachelor 103 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 60 6%
Other 162 15%
Unknown 131 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 394 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 348 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 6%
Psychology 45 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 2%
Other 58 5%
Unknown 152 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#847,930
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,646
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,903
of 245,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#441
of 1,007 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,007 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.