↓ Skip to main content

How stakeholder engagement has led us to reconsider definitions of rigour in systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 142)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How stakeholder engagement has led us to reconsider definitions of rigour in systematic reviews
Published in
Environmental Evidence, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13750-017-0098-7
Authors

Laurenz Langer, Yvonne Erasmus, Natalie Tannous, Ruth Stewart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Unspecified 3 14%
Psychology 2 9%
Other 5 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#446,652
of 11,689,928 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#12
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,095
of 267,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,689,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.