↓ Skip to main content

Stealth nanotubes: strategies of shielding carbon nanotubes to evade opsonization and improve biodistribution

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stealth nanotubes: strategies of shielding carbon nanotubes to evade opsonization and improve biodistribution
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2014
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s51854
Authors

Jin-Woo Kim, Nalinikanth Kotagiri

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
India 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 15%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 14 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Materials Science 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 11 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,514,157
of 13,344,686 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#861
of 2,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,739
of 190,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#38
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,344,686 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,594 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.