↓ Skip to main content

What do guidelines and systematic reviews tell us about the management of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care?

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 103)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
What do guidelines and systematic reviews tell us about the management of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care?
Published in
BJGP Open, August 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen17x101061
Authors

Tim C olde Hartman, Marianne Rosendal, Aase Aamland, Henriette E van der Horst, Judith GM Rosmalen, Chris D Burton, Peter LBJ Lucassen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 2 50%
Unspecified 1 25%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#691,760
of 11,809,779 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#18
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,674
of 268,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,809,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.