↓ Skip to main content

What do guidelines and systematic reviews tell us about the management of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care?

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
What do guidelines and systematic reviews tell us about the management of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care?
Published in
BJGP Open, August 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen17x101061
Authors

Tim C olde Hartman, Marianne Rosendal, Aase Aamland, Henriette E van der Horst, Judith GM Rosmalen, Chris D Burton, Peter LBJ Lucassen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2017.
All research outputs
#496,416
of 8,396,916 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#5
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,514
of 201,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,396,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.