↓ Skip to main content

Violência conjugal: as controvérsias no relato dos parceiros íntimos em inquéritos policiais

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Violência conjugal: as controvérsias no relato dos parceiros íntimos em inquéritos policiais
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, April 2014
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232014194.01202013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Caroline Luz Grüdtner da Silva, Elza Berger Salema Coelho, Kathie Njaine

Abstract

This article analyzes the motivation behind domestic violence based on the testimonies of men and women registered in police investigations by the Sixth Police Station for Women, Children and Adolescents in Florianópolis in the state of Santa Catarina in 2010. It is the result of a quantitative and qualitative survey conducted between August and November 2011. The information obtained in the investigation into domestic violence perpetrated by partners or ex-partners and containing the testimony of the couple in 172 police investigations was analyzed. The issues selected for analysis were the profile of the couple and the reports of violence according to the women and the men. The results showed that most of the couples were separated or divorced, aged between 31 and 40, gainfully employed and had lived together between one and eleven years. The assaults occurred due to drug use and/or jealousy. The men blamed the women for being responsible for their acts or played down the situation and claimed to be victims of violence committed by the partners. The study concludes that cultural issues of gender and socio-economic characteristics are linked to this type of violence, and showed that men do not acknowledge their actions as being violent, most often downplaying the consequences of such violence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 27%
Student > Master 6 14%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#12,899,129
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#749
of 1,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,511
of 226,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,857 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.