↓ Skip to main content

Extracting Kinematic Parameters for Monkey Bipedal Walking from Cortical Neuronal Ensemble Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracting Kinematic Parameters for Monkey Bipedal Walking from Cortical Neuronal Ensemble Activity
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, March 2009
DOI 10.3389/neuro.07.003.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathan A. Fitzsimmons, Mikhail A. Lebedev, Ian D. Peikon, Miguel A. L. Nicolelis

Abstract

The ability to walk may be critically impacted as the result of neurological injury or disease. While recent advances in brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have demonstrated the feasibility of upper-limb neuroprostheses, BMIs have not been evaluated as a means to restore walking. Here, we demonstrate that chronic recordings from ensembles of cortical neurons can be used to predict the kinematics of bipedal walking in rhesus macaques - both offline and in real time. Linear decoders extracted 3D coordinates of leg joints and leg muscle electromyograms from the activity of hundreds of cortical neurons. As more complex patterns of walking were produced by varying the gait speed and direction, larger neuronal populations were needed to accurately extract walking patterns. Extraction was further improved using a switching decoder which designated a submodel for each walking paradigm. We propose that BMIs may one day allow severely paralyzed patients to walk again.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Germany 5 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 189 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 27%
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 8%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 60 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 19%
Neuroscience 25 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 33 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,953,553
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#146
of 913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,081
of 107,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them