You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Harmful effects of shisha: literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Archives of Medicine, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1755-7682-7-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hafiz Muhammad Aslam, Shafaq Saleem, Sidra German, Wardah Asif Qureshi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Nigeria | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Jordan | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#670,621
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Medicine
#6
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,000
of 240,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them