↓ Skip to main content

Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004272.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna Morgan, Lynda Wyld, Karen A Collins, Malcolm W Reed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 23%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Psychology 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 22 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2014.
All research outputs
#1,054,587
of 12,607,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,401
of 10,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,989
of 188,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,607,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.