↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin K for improved anticoagulation control in patients receiving warfarin

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin K for improved anticoagulation control in patients receiving warfarin
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009917.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamal R Mahtani, Carl J Heneghan, David Nunan, Nia W Roberts

Abstract

Effective use of warfarin involves keeping the international normalised ratio (INR) within a relatively narrow therapeutic range. However, patients respond widely to their dose of warfarin. Overcoagulation can lead to an increased risk of excessive bleeding, while undercoagulation can lead to increased clot formation. There is some evidence that patients with a variable response to warfarin may benefit from a concomitant low dose of vitamin K.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 24%
Student > Master 14 21%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 7 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,161,404
of 13,038,232 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,579
of 10,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,839
of 188,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#72
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,038,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.