↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010681.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khadra Galaal, Mansour Al Moundhri, Andrew Bryant, Alberto D Lopes, Theresa A Lawrie

Abstract

Approximately 13% of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer present with advanced stage disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV). The standard treatment of advanced endometrial cancer consists of cytoreductive surgery followed by radiation therapy, or chemotherapy, or both. There is currently little agreement about which adjuvant treatment is the safest and most effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 12%
Student > Master 14 9%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 13 9%
Other 37 25%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 36 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,494,455
of 14,656,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,149
of 11,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,472
of 187,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,656,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.