You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strategy for the treatment and follow-up of sinonasal solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma: a case series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13256-017-1382-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Cantone, Antonella Miriam Di Lullo, Luana Marano, Elia Guadagno, Gelsomina Mansueto, Pasquale Capriglione, Lucio Catalano, Maurizio Iengo |
| Abstract |
Extramedullary plasmacytoma is a rare neoplasm characterized by monoclonal proliferation of plasma cells outside bone marrow. It accounts for 4% of all non-epithelial sinonasal tumors. According to the literature, radiotherapy is the standard therapy for extramedullary plasmacytoma. However, the conversion rate of extramedullary plasmacytoma to multiple myeloma is reported to be between 11 and 33% over 10 years. The highest risk of conversion is reported during the first 2 years after diagnosis, but conversion has been noted up to 15 years after diagnosis. Once conversion to multiple myeloma is complete, less than 10% of patients will survive 10 years. We present three cases of sinonasal extramedullary plasmacytoma who underwent radiotherapy: a 61-year-old white man, a 60-year-old white man, and a 37-year-old white woman. We found long-term survival with stable disease in all three cases. The management of solitary extramedullary plasmacytomas of the sinonasal tract is not well established yet. However, the possibility of recurrence and progression to multiple myeloma requires a thorough follow-up protocol. Due to the absence of a standardized protocol for these tumors, we tried to design a tailored long-term follow-up scheme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 31% |
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,911,821
of 22,997,544 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,924
of 3,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,936
of 318,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#30
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,997,544 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,944 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.