↓ Skip to main content

Implicit Motivational Processes Underlying Smoking in American and Dutch Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implicit Motivational Processes Underlying Smoking in American and Dutch Adolescents
Published in
Frontiers in Psychiatry, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larsen, Helle, Kong, Grace, Becker, Daniela, Cousijn, Janna, Boendermaker, Wouter, Cavallo, Dana, Krishnan-Sarin, Suchitra, Wiers, Reinout W, Helle Larsen, Grace Kong, Daniela Becker, Janna Cousijn, Wouter Boendermaker, Dana Cavallo, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Reinout Wiers, Wiers, Reinout

Abstract

Research demonstrates that cognitive biases toward drug-related stimuli are correlated with substance use. This study aimed to investigate differences in cognitive biases (i.e., approach bias, attentional bias, and memory associations) between smoking and non-smoking adolescents in the US and the Netherlands. Within the group of smokers, we examined the relative predictive value of the cognitive biases and impulsivity related constructs (including inhibition skills, working memory, and risk taking) on daily smoking and nicotine dependence.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 76%
Unspecified 5 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,101,864
of 11,411,293 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#793
of 1,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,537
of 184,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychiatry
#24
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,411,293 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.