↓ Skip to main content

Imipramine for neuropathic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imipramine for neuropathic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010769.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie Hearn, Sheena Derry, Tudor Phillips, R Andrew Moore, Philip J Wiffen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 22 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 14%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 28 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,031,150
of 15,062,424 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,954
of 11,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,134
of 190,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,062,424 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.