↓ Skip to main content

Written emotional disclosure for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Written emotional disclosure for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007676.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priyamvada Paudyal, Paul Hine, Alice Theadom, Christian J Apfelbacher, Christina J Jones, Janelle Yorke, Matthew Hankins, Helen E Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Unspecified 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Psychology 16 26%
Unspecified 8 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Other 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,718,921
of 12,585,337 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,324
of 10,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,679
of 188,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,585,337 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.