You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The psychological impact of a dual-disaster caused by earthquakes and radioactive contamination in Ichinoseki after the Great East Japan Earthquake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-7-307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomihisa Niitsu, Kota Takaoka, Saho Uemura, Akiko Kono, Akihiko Saito, Norito Kawakami, Michiko Nakazato, Eiji Shimizu |
| Abstract |
The psychological impact of dual-disasters (earthquakes and a nuclear accident), on affected communities is unknown. This study investigated the impact of a dual-disaster (earthquakes and radioactive contamination) on the prevalence of psychological distress in a landlocked city within the Tohoku area, Japan. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#16,099,609
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,347
of 4,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,479
of 228,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#54
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.