↓ Skip to main content

InSAR detects increase in surface subsidence caused by an Arctic tundra fire

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
InSAR detects increase in surface subsidence caused by an Arctic tundra fire
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/2014gl060533
Authors

Lin Liu, Elchin E. Jafarov, Kevin M. Schaefer, Benjamin M. Jones, Howard A. Zebker, Christopher A. Williams, John Rogan, Tingjun Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Student > Master 8 17%
Unspecified 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 39%
Environmental Science 12 26%
Unspecified 7 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,623,479
of 12,342,171 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#6,944
of 12,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,202
of 195,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#120
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,171 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.