↓ Skip to main content

InSAR detects increase in surface subsidence caused by an Arctic tundra fire

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
InSAR detects increase in surface subsidence caused by an Arctic tundra fire
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, June 2014
DOI 10.1002/2014gl060533
Authors

Lin Liu, Elchin E. Jafarov, Kevin M. Schaefer, Benjamin M. Jones, Howard A. Zebker, Christopher A. Williams, John Rogan, Tingjun Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 29%
Environmental Science 17 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 6 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#13,360
of 21,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,654
of 241,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#96
of 266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.