↓ Skip to main content

AIDS and non-AIDS severe morbidity associated with hospitalizations among HIV-infected patients in two regions with universal access to care and antiretroviral therapy, France and Brazil, 2000–2008…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AIDS and non-AIDS severe morbidity associated with hospitalizations among HIV-infected patients in two regions with universal access to care and antiretroviral therapy, France and Brazil, 2000–2008: hospital-based cohort studies
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Mendes Luz, Mathias Bruyand, Sayonara Ribeiro, Fabrice Bonnet, Ronaldo Ismério Moreira, Mojgan Hessamfar, Dayse Perreira Campos, Carine Greib, Charles Cazanave, Valdilea Gonçalves Veloso, François Dabis, Beatriz Grinsztejn, Geneviève Chêne, the IPEC/FIOCRUZ Cohort and the Aquitaine ANRS C03 Study Group

Abstract

In high-income settings, the spectrum of morbidity and mortality experienced by Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-infected individuals receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has switched from predominantly AIDS-related to non-AIDS-related conditions. In the context of universal access to care, we evaluated whether that shift would apply in Brazil, a middle-income country with universal access to treatment, as compared to France.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Jamaica 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 24 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 25 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#12,585,586
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,842
of 7,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,020
of 226,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#62
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.