↓ Skip to main content

Laminin 411 acts as a potent inducer of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into insulin-producing cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laminin 411 acts as a potent inducer of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into insulin-producing cells
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-12-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huiting Qu, Xiaoli Liu, Yihong Ni, Yang Jiang, Xiaoli Feng, Juan Xiao, Yanan Guo, Dexiao Kong, Ai Li, Xiaomei Li, Xianghua Zhuang, Zhilun Wang, Yongjing Wang, Yali Chang, Shihong Chen, Feng Kong, Xuhua Zhang, Shengtian Zhao, Yi Sun, Dawei Xu, Daoqing Wang, Chengyun Zheng

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an incurable metabolic disease constituting a major threat to human health. Insulin-producing cells (IPCs) differentiated from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold great promise in the treatment of DM. The development of an efficient IPC induction system is a crucial step for the clinical application of IPCs for DM. Laminin 411 is a key component of the basement membrane and is involved in the regulation of cell differentiation; however, little is known about a role of laminin 411 in the regulation of IPC differentiation from human MSCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,272,053
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#949
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,846
of 226,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#12
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.