You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Transcranial doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-7120-12-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monika Komar, Maria Olszowska, Tadeusz Przewłocki, Jakub Podolec, Jakub Stępniewski, Bartosz Sobień, Rafał Badacz, Anna Kabłak-Ziembicka, Lidia Tomkiewicz-Pająk, Piotr Podolec |
| Abstract |
Persistent foramen ovale (PFO) is considered a cause of cryptogenic stroke and a risk factor for neurological events in young patients. The reference standard for identifying a PFO is contrast-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).The goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of transcranial color Doppler (TCD) and its diagnostic sensitivity compared with TEE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 61 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 52% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,196,440
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#166
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,164
of 226,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.